Climate Fund Managers has secured $182 million in the first close of a new South African green hydrogen fund, bringing together public and private capital to finance projects spanning green hydrogen, ammonia and methanol as the country seeks to develop new industrial capacity while reducing emissions from sectors that are difficult to electrify.
The SA-H2 Fund, also known as Climate Investor Three South Africa, will invest across the green hydrogen value chain, including production and downstream derivatives, as well as projects aimed at decarbonising steel, fertiliser, e-fuels and chemical industries. The fund is targeting a final size of $738.18 million by mid-2028, making its ability to convert early-stage commitments into commercially viable projects an important test for the development of South Africa’s emerging hydrogen economy.
The first close brings together development finance institutions, government-linked investors and private financial institutions through a blended-finance structure intended to address one of the main constraints facing large-scale energy-transition projects: the gap between early-stage development risk and the requirements of institutional investors.
The fund’s Development Tranche provides early-stage capital and technical assistance to prepare projects for final investment decisions, while its blended Equity Tranches are designed to finance projects from financial close through construction. Commitments to the Development Tranche have come from Invest International, the European Commission through its Global Gateway strategy and the Industrial Development Corporation of South Africa, while equity commitments include South Africa’s Public Investment Corporation, acting on behalf of the Government Employees Pension Fund, Sanlam Life Insurance, Invest International and the European Commission. The Development Bank of Southern Africa is also supporting the fund.
According to Climate Fund Managers, the fund has already entered development funding agreements with Green Efuels Producers for a wastewater-to-green-methanol project in Gauteng and the Hive Hydrogen Coega Green Ammonia Project, which is developing a large-scale green ammonia facility in South Africa.
The financing structure reflects the economics of an industry that remains expensive and capital-intensive. Green hydrogen projects require renewable power, electrolysis equipment, water resources, storage and transport infrastructure, while downstream products such as ammonia and methanol require additional processing and industrial facilities. The commercial viability of individual projects therefore depends not only on technology costs but also on access to reliable renewable electricity, infrastructure, long-term buyers and competitively priced capital.
For South Africa, the stakes extend beyond emissions reduction. The country has substantial renewable-energy potential and an established industrial base, but its economy remains heavily dependent on carbon-intensive industries and coal-fired electricity. Developing green hydrogen and related products could provide an avenue for retaining industrial activity while gradually reducing the emissions intensity of sectors such as chemicals, steel and fertiliser production.
The challenge is translating that potential into projects capable of reaching financial close and operating at commercial scale. Green hydrogen markets are still developing, and projects must compete with established fossil-fuel-based alternatives whose infrastructure and supply chains are already mature. The ability to secure long-term offtake agreements, manage infrastructure costs and demonstrate reliable production will therefore be central to determining whether investment commitments result in operating assets.
Andrew Johnstone, Chief Executive of Climate Fund Managers, said the energy transition would require solutions beyond electrification, particularly for industrial sectors where direct use of renewable electricity may not be technically or economically practical. The fund’s strategy reflects that premise by focusing on hydrogen and derivatives that can potentially be used as lower-carbon feedstocks and fuels.
The European Commission’s participation also places the fund within a wider effort to connect European climate and industrial objectives with investment opportunities in partner economies. Through its Global Gateway strategy, the commission is seeking to mobilise investment in infrastructure and sustainable development, including projects that can contribute to the decarbonisation of international supply chains.
For Africa, the significance of the fund lies partly in the financing model. Many of the continent’s energy-transition projects face a similar problem: the underlying resource may be commercially attractive, but early-stage development risks, currency volatility, infrastructure constraints and limited local capital can make projects difficult to finance on conventional terms.
Blended finance can potentially reduce some of those barriers by placing concessional or development-oriented capital alongside commercial investment. In this case, early-stage development funding is intended to help transform projects from concepts requiring substantial technical and financial preparation into assets that institutional investors can evaluate against established investment criteria.
That distinction is important because Africa’s clean-energy financing gap is not simply a shortage of available capital. It is also a shortage of sufficiently prepared, bankable projects capable of absorbing large pools of institutional and private investment. Development finance can help address that pipeline problem, although the effectiveness of the model ultimately depends on projects reaching construction and generating predictable returns.
South Africa’s domestic institutions are playing a significant role in the fund. The participation of the Public Investment Corporation, representing the Government Employees Pension Fund, and Sanlam places local institutional capital alongside international development finance. That could become increasingly relevant as South African pension and investment funds assess how to allocate capital to infrastructure and energy-transition assets while meeting their fiduciary responsibilities.
The involvement of the Industrial Development Corporation and Development Bank of Southern Africa also connects the fund to South Africa’s broader industrial and infrastructure policy objectives. For the country, the economic value of green hydrogen will depend on whether projects create local supply chains, technical skills, manufacturing capacity and export opportunities rather than relying predominantly on imported technology and external expertise.
Hydrogen derivatives may offer one route into international markets. Green ammonia, for example, can serve both as an industrial input and as a potential energy carrier, while green methanol has applications in shipping, chemicals and other industrial processes. South Africa’s location, renewable-energy resources and established ports could give projects linked to international trade a strategic dimension, although competitiveness will depend on production costs and access to infrastructure.
The Coega green ammonia project in the Eastern Cape is therefore significant beyond its individual investment case. If large-scale production develops successfully, it could help establish industrial infrastructure and supply chains around a product that is increasingly being considered in discussions about lower-carbon shipping fuels, fertiliser production and international energy trade.
The wastewater-to-green-methanol project in Gauteng similarly illustrates how developers are exploring ways to connect waste management, industrial production and decarbonisation. Such projects could create multiple environmental and economic benefits, but their viability will depend on feedstock availability, technology performance, operating costs and demand for the resulting products.
South Africa is not alone in seeking to develop a green hydrogen economy. Egypt, Namibia and several other African countries are pursuing hydrogen-related projects, while governments across the continent are attempting to position renewable resources as a source of industrial investment and export revenue. Competition for capital and future markets is likely to make project economics, infrastructure quality and regulatory certainty increasingly important.
The emergence of dedicated funds such as SA-H2 also raises questions about how African economies can ensure that transition finance produces broader development outcomes. Job creation, local procurement, skills development and domestic industrial participation will determine how much value is retained within the economy. These considerations are particularly important for South Africa, where energy policy is closely linked to employment, industrial competitiveness and regional development.
Climate Fund Managers’ previous funds provide part of the institutional background to the strategy. Climate Investor One and Climate Investor Two have together mobilised more than $2 billion for renewable energy, water, waste and oceans infrastructure in emerging markets. The firm’s GAIA Climate Loan Fund, meanwhile, reached its first close in 2025 and is targeting a final close of $1.48 billion in 2027.
The SA-H2 Fund’s immediate challenge is therefore not simply to raise additional capital but to demonstrate that green hydrogen projects can move through development, financing, construction and operation while delivering commercially credible returns. Its targeted final size of $738.18 million by mid-2028 will provide a larger pool of capital, but the quality and maturity of the investment pipeline will determine how effectively that capital can be deployed.
For South Africa and the wider African energy-transition market, the fund offers a practical test of whether blended finance can bridge the distance between climate ambition and industrial investment. The outcome will depend on factors extending well beyond the availability of capital, including electricity costs, infrastructure, policy certainty, technology performance, offtake demand and the capacity of local institutions and businesses to participate in the emerging value chain.
Was this article helpful?
